p. 2457−2465
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2467−2479
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2481−2489
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2491−2502
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2503−2510
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2511−2516
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2517−2526
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2527−2530
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2531−2542
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2543−2549
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2551−2560
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2561−2566
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2567−2576
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2577−2586
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2587−2596
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2597−2605
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
CHX + GI > AV + GI. GI group showed the lowest mean inhibition zone diameter with a statistically significantly. Conclusion: Aloe Vera is beneficial in the inhibition of Streptococcus mutans growth up to 48 hours. The incorporation of Aloe Vera in glass ionomers seems to improve the antibacterial activity of glass ionomer restoration.]]>
p. 2607−2616
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2617−2623
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2625−2633
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2635−2640
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2641−2649
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
0.05Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that there is no difference in microbial flora between the two attachment systems. It can also be suggested that the locator attachments are valid treatment alternative for ball abutments to retain mandibular 2-implant overdentures from a biological point of view.]]>
p. 2651−2659
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2661−2671
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2673−2679
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2681−2689
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2691−2698
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2699−2707
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2709−2722
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2723−2730
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2731−2738
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2739−2747
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2749−2762
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2763−2767
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2769−2777
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2779−2793
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2795−2800
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2801−2811
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2813−2819
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
0.05). After thermocycling, all tested groups revealed significant improvement in SBS (p<0.001). Conclusions: A modified PEEK material strengthened with 20% submicron ceramic fillers, could be treated by etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 1 min, to enhance bond strength to veneering composites and was found to have significant improvement in bond strength after thermocycling.]]>
p. 2821−2830
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2831−2835
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2837−2848
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2849−2855
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2857−2866
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2867−2873
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2875−2887
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2889−2897
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2899−2910
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2911−2920
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2921−2929
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2931−2944
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2945−2954
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2955−2965
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2967−2980
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2981−2992
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2993−2997
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 2999−3006
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3007−3018
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
0.05) higher marginal gap mean value (37.15±5.34 µm) than group A (34.2±4.84 µm). while for the internal adaptation it was found that group A recorded statistically significant higher internal gap mean value (91.93±17.41 µm) than group B (57.97±14.08 µm). It was found that Group B recorded statistically non-significant higher fatigue resistance mean value (1130.58±31.53N) than Group A (1114.84±45.04N). Conclusion: Different preparation designs affect the marginal adaptation of the restoration which was statistically significant only before cementation. The non-anatomic group (B) showed statistically significant lower internal gap than anatomic group (A). While there was no significant difference in the fatigue resistance of both groups after thermocyclic loading.]]>
p. 3019−3029
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3031−3036
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3037−3044
2090-2360
Vol.65/No.Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)