p. 3535−3542
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3543−3550
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3551−3558
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3559−3566
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3567−3574
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3575−3581
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
0.05%). The digital microscope has shown nearly even distribution ofzirconia particles within the acrylic matrix at 0.5% and 1%, while clusters started to form at 2%,and 5% zirconia.Conclusion: Silanized zirconia powder could be used to improve the properties of heatpolymerizedacrylic denture base resin. The most appropriate percentages were 1% and 2%. ]]>
p. 3583−3592
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3593−3608
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3609−3621
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3623−3630
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3631−3640
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3641−3650
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3651−3659
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3661−3671
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3673−3682
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3683−3696
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3697−3702
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3703−3712
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3713−3721
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3723−3731
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3733−3739
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3741−3745
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3747−3759
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3761−3769
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3771−3780
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
0.05) for all types of locator attachments while sodium hypochlorite gavestatistical significant lower retention values and retention loss percentage (P< 0.05) than thatimmersed in other solutions.Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study Efferdent and Tantum Verde mouthwash canbe used as denture cleanser while sodium hypochlorite is not recommended.]]>
p. 3781−3788
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3789−3800
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
0.05). After thermocycling, all studied adhesive groups revealedsignificant reduction in μTBS (p < 0.001).Conclusions: 0.5 wt% HPN incorporated dental adhesives could achieve a promisingantibacterial effect without adversely affect the adhesive characteristics; however, thermocyclingsignificantly reduced the μTBS.]]>
p. 3801−3812
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3813−3822
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3823−3831
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3833−3843
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3845−3853
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3855−3863
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3865−3872
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3873−3881
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3883−3887
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3889−3894
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
Syringe). Pair-wise Turkey’s post-hoc showed no significant difference inthe push-out bond strength between (PUI and XP). Regardless of irrigation solutions or applicationtechniques; there was no significant difference in the push-out bond strength between radicularregions as verified by three-way ANOVA test where (cervical ≥ apical ≥ middle). Regarding thesmear layer marking; it was found that there was non-significant difference between both irrigationsolutions as proven by Chi square test where (NaOCL+EDTA > Qmix). There was also nonsignificantdifference between irrigation application techniques as demonstrated by Chi square testwhere (Syringe ≥ PUI≥ XP). In addition, there was non-significant difference between radicularregions as verified by Chi square test where (apical ≥ middle ≥ cervical).Conclusions Within the limitations of this study it was concluded that:1. Q mix irrigation solution decreased the bond strength between root dentin and fiber postswhen self adhesive luting agent was used.2. The use of XP finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation as irrigant activation devicesimproved the bond strength between root dentin and fiber posts compared to conventionalsyringe irrigation.]]>
p. 3895−3906
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3907−3918
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3919−3926
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3927−3934
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3935−3941
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3943−3948
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3949−3956
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3957−3963
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3965−3971
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3973−3983
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3985−3994
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 3995−4002
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 4003−4012
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 4013−4017
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
0.05). Retention decreased significantly as indicated by three-way ANOVA (P= 0.007<0.05).
Conclusion: Retention forces of PEEK clasps were clinically acceptable, and superior to retention forces of Acetal clasps. However, both the retention of adequately designed resin clasps might be enough for clinical use. Clasps made of PEEK showed the more promising retentive force with a non-fracture tendency at tooth undercut.]]>
p. 4019−4025
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
0.05). On the other hand there was statistically significant difference between group T-NT (2 MPa) and groups T-SE and T-PA groups (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Conditioning of prepared dentin using self-etching adhesive or polyacrylic acid significantly increased the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement.]]>
p. 4027−4037
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 4039−4048
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 4049−4056
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)
p. 4057−4065
2090-2360
Vol.64/No.Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)