p. 1−7
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 9−19
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 21−28
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 29−36
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 37−45
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 47−57
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 59−72
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 73−87
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
GI=GII>GIV, after 7 days: GIII = GII > GI> GIV, and after the exposure to acidic challenge: GIII>GI>GII>GIV
Conclusion: The RMGI sealing technology showed a more promising effect on the degree of dentinal tubules occlusion compared to the innovative occluding technologies, based on the self assembly peptides, or conventional sodium fluoride varnish
Clinical relevance: The use of RMGI sealing technology can show immediate relief of dentin hypersensitivity owing to its immediate and lasting effect. Meanwhile the innovative occluding technologies based on the nanohydroxyapatite and self assembly peptides, need sometime to show a more profound effect. Nevertheless they are not recommended to patients with high citrus acid products consumption.]]>
p. 89−98
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 99−114
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 115−122
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
0.05) between cast metal post group (227.77± 42.40 N) and everStick post group (225.15± 23.65N). Moreover, post length with 14mm recorded the highest statistically significant difference (p<0.05) mean value (278.45± 33.81 N) followed by post length 12mm (241.37± 42.74 N) then post length 10mm recorded the lowest statistically significant difference (p<0.05) mean value (159.57± 17.53 N).
Conclusion: It can be concluded that the pull out bond strength (debonding force) is directly proportional to post length]]>
p. 123−128
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 129−135
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 137−144
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 145−151
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 153−158
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 159−168
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 169−176
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 177−183
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 185−192
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 193−201
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 203−209
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 211−213
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 215−224
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
0–3.5mm) which was found to be (71.8%). Anterior open bite (<0 mm) was found in (5.9%) of the total sample.
Conclusion: Compared to previous Egyptian studies, there was a tendency toward decrease in the prevalence of accepted occlusion while, there was an increase in Angle Class II and III malocclusion. ]]>
p. 225−231
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 233−238
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 239−245
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 247−250
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 251−256
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 257−267
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 269−276
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 277−284
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)
p. 285−294
2090-2360
Vol.62/No.Issue 1 - January (Part 1)