p. 485−495
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
0.05). Conclusions:Although visually nonperceptible,HIPC or nanohybrid composite veneered PEEK crowns showed a color difference after thermocycling and immersion in different mouth rinses.]]>
p. 497−507
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 509−518
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 519−530
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 531−536
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 537−546
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 547−561
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 563−570
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 571−581
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 583−587
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
0.05, Conclusion: From the results of this study, it could be concluded that laser grooved implant retained overdenture showed minimal bone height changes after 1 year from prosthetic loading.]]>
p. 589−596
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 597−613
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
(PRF) VERSUS XENOGRAFT]]>
ON PRIMARY STABILITY IN MANDIBULAR]]>
]]>
p. 615−623
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
VERSUS XENOGRAFT IN CLOSED SINUS :]]>
LIFT WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT :]]>
ON IMPLANT STABILITY IN MAXILLARY POSTERIOR AREA :]]>
]]>
p. 625−634
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 635−650
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 651−660
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 661−668
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
ON BONE DENSITY]]>
IN IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT]]>
]]>
p. 669−677
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 679−688
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 689−697
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 699−709
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
0.05) for Prettaue (P=0.607), Prettaue Anterior (P=0.273) and Vita Suprinty group (P=0.201). There was significant increase (P≤0. 05) for IPS. Emax group (P=0.007) and Vita Enamic groups (P=0.021). Prettaue Anterior group showed the least amount of surface roughness change (0.0006±0.002), while Vita Enamic group showed the highest surface roughness change (0.0100±0.011). Conclusions: The gastric acid significantly increased the surface roughness of hybrid ceramics and lithium disilicate ceramics]]>
p. 711−716
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 717−728
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
(GpB), after warming at 50℃, in the third group (GpC), two prewarming cycles were performed. Light-curing for 20seconds was applied. Micro-shear bond strength testing (μSBS) was performed using universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure occurred. The μSBS was calculated in MPa by dividing the load (Newton) over the respective surface area (mm 2 ).Data were tabulated and analyzed and showed normal distribution when checked using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. One-way ANOVA used to compare between the tested groups for μSBS data followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc test for pairwise comparisons. Significant level was set at 5% (α=0.05). Results: One- way ANOVA showed a significant difference between tested groups (p < 0.001). Where heated composite (two prewarming cycle) showed the highest mSBS compared to other groups (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, heated composite (one prewarming cycle) showed an improved μSBS compared to resin cement group, but the increase was insignificant (p=0.081). Conclusion: pre-heated nanohybrid resin composites seem to be a potential alternative to resin cement to lute ceramic restorations.]]>
p. 729−738
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 739−746
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 747−755
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 757−765
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 767−774
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
p. 775−787
2090-2360
Vol.67/No.Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)