• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Dental Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 67 (2021)
Issue Issue 1 - January (Orthodontics, Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry)
Issue Issue 1 - January (Oral Surgery)
Issue Issue 1 - January (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology)
Issue Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
Issue Issue 1 - January (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)
Volume Volume 66 (2020)
Volume Volume 65 (2019)
Volume Volume 64 (2018)
Volume Volume 63 (2017)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Yehia, T., Abd El Daiem, M., Obeid, M. (2021). Evaluation of Adaptability of Three Different Root Canal Sealers. (In Vitro Study). Egyptian Dental Journal, 67(Issue 1 - January (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)), 817-822. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.43947.1274
Tariq Yehia; Menna Abd El Daiem; Maram Obeid. "Evaluation of Adaptability of Three Different Root Canal Sealers. (In Vitro Study)". Egyptian Dental Journal, 67, Issue 1 - January (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics), 2021, 817-822. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.43947.1274
Yehia, T., Abd El Daiem, M., Obeid, M. (2021). 'Evaluation of Adaptability of Three Different Root Canal Sealers. (In Vitro Study)', Egyptian Dental Journal, 67(Issue 1 - January (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)), pp. 817-822. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.43947.1274
Yehia, T., Abd El Daiem, M., Obeid, M. Evaluation of Adaptability of Three Different Root Canal Sealers. (In Vitro Study). Egyptian Dental Journal, 2021; 67(Issue 1 - January (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)): 817-822. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.43947.1274

Evaluation of Adaptability of Three Different Root Canal Sealers. (In Vitro Study)

Article 4, Volume 67, Issue 1 - January (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics), January 2021, Page 817-822  XML PDF (1.64 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2020.43947.1274
Authors
Tariq Yehia email 1; Menna Abd El Daiem2; Maram Obeid3
1Lecturer of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University
2MSc of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University
3Associate Professor of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to compare Guttaflow bioseal, MTA-Fillapex, and AH plus with regards to their adaptability on dentin surface. Methods: Thirty (n=30) single rooted human teeth were instrumented and divided into three groups according to the type of sealer used (each n=10). All root canals were obturated with lateral compaction technique. Roots were cut longitudinally and evaluated for adaptability using scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 1500x. Five readings were taken for the widest gap distances at the three thirds of the root for each specimen. Results: AH plus group showed less mean values of gap distances than the other groups at apical and middle two thirds, while GuttaFlow bioseal mean gap distance was less at the coronal one third. MTA-F group showed the higher mean values among the three thirds of the root with no significant difference. Conclusion: AH plus showed superior adaptability than GuttaFlow bioseal, while the worst was MTA-Fillapex.
Keywords
Adaptability; GuttaFlow bioseal; Sealer-dentine interface
Statistics
Article View: 24
PDF Download: 32
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.