• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Dental Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 68 (2022)
Volume Volume 67 (2021)
Issue Issue 4
October (Orthodontics, Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry)
Issue Issue 4
October (Oral Surgery)
Issue Issue 4
October (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology)
Issue Issue 4
October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
Issue Issue 4
October (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)
Issue Issue 3
July (Orthodontics, Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry)
Issue Issue 3
July (Oral Surgery)
Issue Issue 3
July (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology)
Issue Issue 3
July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
Issue Issue 3
July (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)
Issue Issue 2
April (Orthodontics, Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry)
Issue Issue 2
April (Oral Surgery)
Issue Issue 2
April (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology)
Issue Issue 2
April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
Issue Issue 2
April (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)
Issue Issue 1 - January (Orthodontics, Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry)
Issue Issue 1 - January (Oral Surgery)
Issue Issue 1 - January (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology)
Issue Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
Issue Issue 1 - January (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)
Volume Volume 66 (2020)
Volume Volume 65 (2019)
Volume Volume 64 (2018)
Volume Volume 63 (2017)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Wakwak, M., Elkady, H., Basha, I. (2021). Comparative evaluation of four different remineralizing agents on dentin surface topography: an invitro study. Egyptian Dental Journal, 67(2), 1647-1655. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.56755.1447
Mohamed Wakwak; Hamed Elkady; Ibrahim Basha. "Comparative evaluation of four different remineralizing agents on dentin surface topography: an invitro study". Egyptian Dental Journal, 67, 2, 2021, 1647-1655. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.56755.1447
Wakwak, M., Elkady, H., Basha, I. (2021). 'Comparative evaluation of four different remineralizing agents on dentin surface topography: an invitro study', Egyptian Dental Journal, 67(2), pp. 1647-1655. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.56755.1447
Wakwak, M., Elkady, H., Basha, I. Comparative evaluation of four different remineralizing agents on dentin surface topography: an invitro study. Egyptian Dental Journal, 2021; 67(2): 1647-1655. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.56755.1447

Comparative evaluation of four different remineralizing agents on dentin surface topography: an invitro study

Article 6, Volume 67, Issue 2 - Serial Number 5, April 2021, Page 1647-1655  XML PDF (922.41 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.56755.1447
Authors
Mohamed Wakwak email orcid ; Hamed Elkady; Ibrahim Basha
Lecturer of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al Azhar University
Abstract
this study was designed to evaluate the effect of four remineralizing agents on surface topography of dentin. Materials and methods: 75 teeth were were divided according to the remineralizing agents into five treatment groups (Control C, CPP-ACP A, NovaMin V, n-HA N & NaF F) 15 teeth each. Time of pH cycling periods were divided to (one week (W1), two weeks (W2) and five weeks (W5) Results: Regarding all of pH cycle periods (W1, W2&W5); there was statistically significant difference between mean dentinal tubules diameter values of the control group on one hand and each of A, V, N and F groups on the other hand. However, there was no statistically significance difference between all those remineralizing agents. The N groups showed the lowest mean value of dentinal tubules diameter while the F groups showed the highest mean value of dentinal tubules diameter
Conclusions: surface topography of dentin is positively affected by the application of remineralizing agents. Increasing the application rate (pH cycling periods) of the remineralizing agents significantly affect the surface topography of dentin.
Keywords
remineralizing agent; surface topography; Nano-hydroxyapatite
Statistics
Article View: 125
PDF Download: 312
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.