Aim: To compare the amount of extruded debris with three endodontic NiTi engine driven systems, Protaper Next, Hyflex CM and EdgeFile X7. Material and Methods: A total number of 42 freshly extracted human premolars were selected. Teeth were divided randomly into three equal groups (14 teeth each group) according to type of Ni-Ti rotary file system; (A) Protaper Next, (B) Hyflex CM and (C) EdgeFile X7. Standard Access cavity prepared and checked for patency using K file #10 and #15. Root canal instrumentation on the single canal lower premolars was done. Debris was collected after root canal instrumentation in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. The Eppendorf tubes were weighed 2 times on the analytical balance. First weight: Before instrumentation. Second weight: After evaporation of moisture and irrigant and incubation. Welch test was used for comparison between the three groups. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the amounts of debris extrusion of the three groups Conclusion: All endodontic rotary instruments tested produced apical extrusion of debris.
AbdelWahed, A. (2021). Comparative assessment of apically extruded debris using Protaper Next, Hyflex CM and EdgeFile X7 nickel titanium instruments (An in vitro Study). Egyptian Dental Journal, 67(4), 3751-3757. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.90728.1751
MLA
Adel AbdelWahed. "Comparative assessment of apically extruded debris using Protaper Next, Hyflex CM and EdgeFile X7 nickel titanium instruments (An in vitro Study)". Egyptian Dental Journal, 67, 4, 2021, 3751-3757. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.90728.1751
HARVARD
AbdelWahed, A. (2021). 'Comparative assessment of apically extruded debris using Protaper Next, Hyflex CM and EdgeFile X7 nickel titanium instruments (An in vitro Study)', Egyptian Dental Journal, 67(4), pp. 3751-3757. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.90728.1751
VANCOUVER
AbdelWahed, A. Comparative assessment of apically extruded debris using Protaper Next, Hyflex CM and EdgeFile X7 nickel titanium instruments (An in vitro Study). Egyptian Dental Journal, 2021; 67(4): 3751-3757. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.90728.1751