• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Dental Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 68 (2022)
Issue Issue 3
July (Orthodontics, Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry)
Issue Issue 3
Issue 3 - ِJuly (Oral Surgery)
Issue Issue 3
Issue 3 - July (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology)
Issue Issue 3
July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
Issue Issue 3
July (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)
Issue Issue 2
April (Orthodontics, Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry)
Issue Issue 2
Oral Surgery
Issue Issue 2
April (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology)
Issue Issue 2
Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials
Issue Issue 2
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Issue Issue 1
January (Orthodontics, Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry)
Issue Issue 1
January (Oral Surgery)
Issue Issue 1
January (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology)
Issue Issue 1
January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
Issue Issue 1
January (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)
Volume Volume 67 (2021)
Volume Volume 66 (2020)
Volume Volume 65 (2019)
Volume Volume 64 (2018)
Volume Volume 63 (2017)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Sultan, M., Abed, Y. (2022). Antibacterial Activity and Compressive Strength of Rosmarinus Officinalis L. Modified Glass Ionomer Cement. Egyptian Dental Journal, 68(2), 1819-1826. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.111910.1924
Mayada Sultan; Yasser Abed. "Antibacterial Activity and Compressive Strength of Rosmarinus Officinalis L. Modified Glass Ionomer Cement". Egyptian Dental Journal, 68, 2, 2022, 1819-1826. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.111910.1924
Sultan, M., Abed, Y. (2022). 'Antibacterial Activity and Compressive Strength of Rosmarinus Officinalis L. Modified Glass Ionomer Cement', Egyptian Dental Journal, 68(2), pp. 1819-1826. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.111910.1924
Sultan, M., Abed, Y. Antibacterial Activity and Compressive Strength of Rosmarinus Officinalis L. Modified Glass Ionomer Cement. Egyptian Dental Journal, 2022; 68(2): 1819-1826. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.111910.1924

Antibacterial Activity and Compressive Strength of Rosmarinus Officinalis L. Modified Glass Ionomer Cement

Article 6, Volume 68, Issue 2 - Serial Number 5, April 2022, Page 1819-1826  XML PDF (634.88 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2022.111910.1924
Authors
Mayada Sultan email orcid 1; Yasser Abed2
1Associate Professor, Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Fayoum University
2Associate Professor, Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, 6 October University
Abstract
ABSTRACT:
Objective: To evaluate the antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans and compressive strength of Rosmarinus officinalis L. modified glass ionomer cement with two different concentrations.
Methods: Rosmarinus officinalis L. leaves were macerated to prepare Rosmarinus officinalis L. extract then the rosemary powdered extract was weighted and added to Fuji IX GIC to prepare 2% and 4% rosemary modified glass ionomer. A total of sixty samples were prepared and divided into 3 groups Group1; glass ionomer (GI) as control group; Group 2; 2% rosemary modified glass ionomer (2% R + GI) and Group 3; 4% rosemary modified glass ionomer (4% R + GI). The antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans for each group were assessed by disc diffusion methods after 48 hours. Compressive strength test was done with a universal testing machine at the rate of 1mm/min. Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed using One-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc test.
Results:
Group 3 (4% R + GI) showed the statistically significant highest antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans and compressive strength mean values followed by group 2 (2% R + GI). However, the glass ionomer control group reported the lowest mean values.
Conclusion: Modification of glass ionomer cement with different concentrations of Rosmarinus officinalis L. enhances the antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans and compressive strength with superior performance for the higher concentration.
Keywords
Rosmarinus officinalis L; Glass ionomer; Streptococcus mutans; Antibacterial activity; Compressive strength
Main Subjects
Conservative Dentistry
Statistics
Article View: 101
PDF Download: 63
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.