ASSESSMENT OF CORONAL MICROLEAKAGE FOLLOWING ROOT CANAL OBTURATION WITH CALCIUM SILICATE SEALERS

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Endodontic Specialty Diploma Student Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon.

2 Professor of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon

3 Assistant Professor of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

Abstract

Introduction: This study compared in vitro the coronal sealing ability of four types of endodontic sealers One-Fil, ADSEAL, GuttaFlow Bioseal, BioRoot RCS
Materials and Methods: Thirty-two single-rooted mandibular premolars were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=8). After Instrumentation, each group obturated using a different type of sealer as group 1: One-Fil, group 2 ADSEAL, group 3: GuttaFlow Bioseal, and group 4: BioRoot RCS. Teeth were cleared then subjected to a dye penetration test, then evaluated under stereomicroscope.
Results: Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare dye penetration depth among the different endodontic sealers. Post-hoc analysis was conducted using Dunn’s multiple comparison test. The mean score of dye penetration could be arranged from the least to the greatest as follows: One-Fil (1.38 ± 0.52) followed by ADSEAL (2.38 ± 0.52) without significant difference between them, however One-Fil recorded lower significant dye penetration compared to GuttaFlow Bioseal (2.5 ± 0.53) and BioRoot RCS which showed the highest mean of dye penetration (2.75 ± 0.46).
Conclusions: Premixed calcium silicate sealer revealed the highest significant resistance against dye penetration while hand mixed calcium silicate sealer revealed the least resistance against coronal dye penetration.
Clinical Relevance: All types of the investigated sealers allowed dye penetration with variable degrees, therefore, proper coronal and apical sealing with adequate final restoration is the key to successful treatment outcome.

Keywords

Main Subjects