Regeneration of Maxillary Cystic Bone Cavities grafted with MPM versus PRF (Comparative study)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Faculty of Oral and Dental medicine, Cairo University, Egypt

2 Lecturer of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. Faculty of Dentistry. October University of Modern Sciences and Art. Egypt

3 Lectuer of Endodontics. Endodontic Department. Faculty of Dentistry. October University of Modern Sciences and Art. Egypt

4 Lecturer of Radiology. Faculty of Dentistry October University of Modern Sciences and Art. Egypt

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of defect filling with mineralized Plasmatic matrix (MPM) versus Platelets Rich fibrin (PRF) after conservative intraosseous cystic lesions enucleation in maxillary bones.
Patients and methods: Twelve patients with large intra osseous maxillary cystic lesions were included in this study, all underwent conservative cyst enucleation. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group I the defect was filled with Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM), and group II the defect was filled with Platelets Rich Fibrin (PRF). Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at zero and 6 months postoperatively.
Results: A statistical significant decrease (p≤0.05) at cysts sizes was obvious at both groups at the follow up interval. When the groups were compared, Group I had statistically significant (p≤0.05) decrease at the cysts sizes than Group II at the follow up period.
Conclusion: MPM showed better values than PRF as a grafting material in defect filling after conservative cystic enucleation in maxillary bones.

Keywords

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics