• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Dental Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 69 (2023)
Issue Issue 1
Issue 1 - January (Orthodontics, Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry)
Issue Issue 1
January (Oral Surgery)
Issue Issue 1
January (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology)
Issue Issue 1
January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials)
Issue Issue 1
January (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)
Volume Volume 68 (2022)
Volume Volume 67 (2021)
Volume Volume 66 (2020)
Volume Volume 65 (2019)
Volume Volume 64 (2018)
Volume Volume 63 (2017)
Volume Volume 62 (2016)
Aboelalla, W., magdy, E., elgamal, A. (2023). Radiographic Evaluation of bone density after bone grafting associated with different laser bio-modulation techniques in rat. Egyptian Dental Journal, 69(1), 363-370. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.170901.2323
Walaa Aboelalla; eman magdy; asmaa elgamal. "Radiographic Evaluation of bone density after bone grafting associated with different laser bio-modulation techniques in rat". Egyptian Dental Journal, 69, 1, 2023, 363-370. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.170901.2323
Aboelalla, W., magdy, E., elgamal, A. (2023). 'Radiographic Evaluation of bone density after bone grafting associated with different laser bio-modulation techniques in rat', Egyptian Dental Journal, 69(1), pp. 363-370. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.170901.2323
Aboelalla, W., magdy, E., elgamal, A. Radiographic Evaluation of bone density after bone grafting associated with different laser bio-modulation techniques in rat. Egyptian Dental Journal, 2023; 69(1): 363-370. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.170901.2323

Radiographic Evaluation of bone density after bone grafting associated with different laser bio-modulation techniques in rat

Article 18, Volume 69, Issue 1 - Serial Number 3, January 2023, Page 363-370  XML PDF (850.94 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2022.170901.2323
Authors
Walaa Aboelalla email orcid 1; eman magdyorcid 2; asmaa elgamalorcid 3
1Associated Professor of Oral Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
2Lecturer of Oral Medicine, Diagnosis and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
3Lecturer of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Abstract
Objective:The objective of the present study was to evaluate the regenerative power of sticky bone in guided tissue regeneration alone compared to sticky bone with different biomodulation techniques in terms of bone density at the regenerated site.
Materials and methods:40 rats were randomly assigned into 5 groups (8 rats each), the control group (CG), the sticky bone group (SB), the sticky bone with LASER (SB-L), the sticky bone with PRF membrane, (SB-P), and sticky bone with LASER and PRF (SB-L-P). A rectangle shaped bone defect (3ml height and 4 mml length) was created in the diastema between the incisors and molar area with preservation of the lingual plate of bone at the mandible of all rats. The defects were filled according to the assigned test groups. 60 days after surgery the rates were radiographically examined to obtain the bone density measurements.
Results:The measurement of bone density in the defect has shown that the SB-L group and SB group had the highest mean (172.5± 15), (169.9± 14.9)respectively. The difference between the two groups were not statistically significant. However, both groups were statistically significant when compared to all three groups, CG, SB-P group and SB-L-P group. All three groups had the lowest mean (72.5±4.7), (74.1±8.4), (88.2±14.5). There were no statistically significant differences between these three groups.
Conclusions: The sticky bone augmented with LASER biomodulation has demonstrated higher bone density compared to sticky bone alone as graft material. However, the addition of PRF, or LASER and PRF has shown to be non-significant.
Keywords
Sticky bone; low level Laser; Platelet rich fibrin; Guided bone regeneration; bone density
Main Subjects
Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology; Oral Biology; Oral Medicine, Periodontology and Diagnosis
Statistics
Article View: 32
PDF Download: 15
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.